I’d really love to see what defenders of campaign finance reform can find to say in their defense after watching this:
Filed under: civil liberties, media/culture, politics
May 11, 2009 • 8:23 pm
I’d really love to see what defenders of campaign finance reform can find to say in their defense after watching this:
Filed under: civil liberties, media/culture, politics
Uh, how about “It sucks to live in a plutocracy”?
From which it follows that the federal government is entitled to ban pay-per-view television programs … how exactly?
Oh, they’re not, of course. This law sucks. But the fact that we have so much influence peddling and quid pro quo in our system sucks as well, and I’d have liked to have seen that at least acknowledged.
I’ll gladly acknowledge that. But restricting political speech isn’t the way to solve it – and indeed, the CFR restrictions we got are arguably as good an example of “influence peddling and quid pro quo” as you could ask for.
[...] John Schwenkler, via Rodney Balko, approves of this video from the Cato Institute. [...]